Total Pageviews

IP Address Info

IP versions

Two versions of the Internet Protocol (IP) are in use: IP Version 4 and IP Version 6. Each version defines an IP address differently. Because of its prevalence, the generic term IP address typically still refers to the addresses defined by IPv4. The gap in version sequence between IPv4 and IPv6 resulted from the assignment of number 5 to the experimental Internet Stream Protocol in 1979, which however was never referred to as IPv5.

IPv4 addresses

IP Address Info, Tech Trailer World
Tech Trailer World, Ip Address Info
Decomposition of an IPv4 address from dot-decimal notation to its binary value.
In IPv4 an address consists of 32 bits which limits the address space to 4294967296 (232) possible unique addresses. IPv4 reserves some addresses for special purposes such as private networks  (~18 million addresses) or multicast addresses (~270 million addresses).

IPv4 addresses are canonically represented in dot-decimal notation, which consists of four decimal numbers, each ranging from 0 to 255, separated by dots, e.g., 172.16.254.1. Each part represents a group of 8 bits (octet) of the address. In some cases of technical writing, IPv4 addresses may be presented in varioushexadecimal, octal, or binary representations.

Classless subnetting

IP networks are groups of adjacent addresses that are usually are routed similarly. Modern IP networks useClassless Inter-Domain Routing where any subnetwork has a common prefix where all bits in the address are identical. Network blocks are written with CIDR notation with an IP address giving the prefix, a slash character, and the number of bits in the prefix. For example, 192.0.2.0/24 indicates there are 24 bits in the network, and they are 192.0.2.

Classful subnetting (historical)

In the early stages of development of the Internet Protocol, network administrators interpreted an IP address in two parts: network number portion and host number portion. The highest order octet (most significant eight bits) in an address was designated as the network number and the remaining bits were called therest field or host identifier and were used for host numbering within a network.
This early method soon proved inadequate as additional networks developed that were independent of the existing networks already designated by a network number. In 1981, the Internet addressing specification was revised with the introduction of classful network architecture.
Classful network design allowed for a larger number of individual network assignments and fine-grained subnetwork design. The first three bits of the most significant octet of an IP address were defined as the class of the address. Three classes (A, B, and C) were defined for universal unicast addressing. Depending on the class derived, the network identification was based on octet boundary segments of the entire address. Each class used successively additional octets in the network identifier, thus reducing the possible number of hosts in the higher order classes (B and C). The following table gives an overview of this now obsolete system.
Historical classful network architecture
ClassLeading
bits
Size of network
number
 bit field
Size of rest
bit field
Number
of networks
Addresses
per network
Start addressEnd address
A0824128 (27)16,777,216 (224)0.0.0.0127.255.255.255
B10161616,384 (214)65,536 (216)128.0.0.0191.255.255.255
C1102482,097,152 (221)256 (28)192.0.0.0223.255.255.255
Classful network design served its purpose in the startup stage of the Internet, but it lacked scalability in the face of the rapid expansion of the network in the 1990s. The class system of the address space was replaced with Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR) in 1993. CIDR is based on variable-length subnet masking (VLSM) to allow allocation and routing based on arbitrary-length prefixes.

Today, remnants of classful network concepts function only in a limited scope as the default configuration parameters of some network software and hardware components (e.g. netmask), and in the technical jargon used in network administrators' discussions.

No comments:

Post a Comment